Optimum News 12 Newsday MSG Varsity Explore LI AM New York Newsday Cars Newsday Homes

Drug dealer facing death for two murders

The New York drug dealer who thought confessing about

his homicidal exploits might make him a friend of police now faces the death

penalty after a Brooklyn federal jury yesterday convicted him of murdering two

narcotics traffickers.

Onlookers said Humberto Pepin-Taveras, 44, who generally goes by the name

Pepin, seemed to get choked up as the jury found him guilty of slaying Jose

Rosario in 1992 and Carlos Madrid in 1995, and then dismembering their bodies.

Federal prosecutors sought the death penalty because they said Pepin

committed the murders in connection with his drug dealing activities.

The jury will begin hearing testimony on Oct. 29 on whether Pepin deserves

to be executed. Since the federal death penalty was reinstituted in 1988 there

has only been one capital punishment verdict in the Brooklyn courthouse. Last

year Ronell Wilson was sentenced to death after he was convicted of murdering

narcotics cops Rodney Andrews and James Nemorin on Staten Island. Wilson is

appealing his conviction.

"I am disappointed. It is unnecessary, it is a waste," said defense

attorney Louis M. Freeman after the verdict.

Co-counsel David Lewis said Pepin had offered to plead guilty in the case

months ago in exchange for life in prison. But U.S. Attorney General Michael

Mukasey rejected the offer, Lewis said.

Pepin was serving a term of more than 12 years for a federal drug

conviction when in March 2002 he started confessing to investigators about the

killings of Madrid and Rosario. Sources said Pepin expected to get a break on

his sentence by admitting his involvement in the killings and dismemberments,

but instead got indicted on murder charges in 2004.

"Nothing short of a piece of duct tape across his lips could have kept

[him] from confessing over and over again," said Judge Jack Weinstein in a

decision filed earlier in the case.

In his defense, Pepin argued that the killings were done in self-defense.

Defense witnesses provided evidence that both victims had wanted to kill Pepin.

The jury apparently rejected the self-defense theory, although it is possible

that the same evidence will be used in the penalty phase in an effort to spare

the defendant's life.

In a recent ruling, Weinstein said that he is prepared to tell the jury to

not consider evidence of the dismemberments as a factor in their deliberations

about whether Pepin should be executed.